ALSO READ

Tashkent Becomes Global Business Hub as Investment Forum Draws Record Deals

June 15, 2025

South Korea’s Opposition leader, Lee Jae-myung Wins Presidential Election

June 4, 2025

The relationship between Donald Trump, the 47th President of the United States, and Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has been one of the most high-profile partnerships in recent American political history. What began as a surprising alliance between two polarizing figures culminated in a public feud that unfolded in real-time during June 2025. This article examines the evolution of their relationship, their joint achievements, the benefits each derived, the reasons behind their falling out, and the potential implications for American politics, the economy, and individual relationships.

The Genesis of the Trump-Musk Alliance

Early Tensions (Pre-2024)

The Trump-Musk relationship was not always amicable. Before 2024, their interactions were marked by skepticism and occasional hostility. Musk, who had historically supported Democratic candidates like Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020, was critical of Trump during his first presidency. In 2016, Musk told CNBC that Trump was “not the right guy” for president, citing concerns about his character. In 2017, Musk resigned from two White House advisory councils after Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, a move Musk opposed. Meanwhile, Trump dismissed Musk as a “b******* artist” in 2022, claiming Musk had privately admitted to voting for him—a claim Musk did not publicly confirm.

Despite these early frictions, their paths began to converge as Musk’s political views shifted rightward, particularly after 2020. Factors such as his frustration with California’s regulatory environment during COVID-19, his move to Texas, and personal experiences, including his child’s transgender identity, contributed to Musk’s growing alignment with conservative causes. By 2024, Musk was ready to back Trump, marking a significant pivot from his earlier Democratic leanings.

A Strategic Partnership (2024)

The turning point came in July 2024, when Musk endorsed Trump on X shortly after an assassination attempt on Trump at a Pennsylvania rally. This endorsement was followed by substantial financial support, with Musk contributing nearly $300 million to Trump’s campaign and other Republican causes, including $120 million in the final weeks of the race. Musk’s super PAC, America PAC, played a pivotal role in amplifying Trump’s message, particularly on X, where right-wing voices gained prominence.

Musk’s involvement went beyond funding. He joined Trump on the campaign trail, appearing at rallies, including one in Butler, Pennsylvania, where he dubbed himself “dark MAGA” and warned that the 2024 election could be the last if Trump did not win. On August 12, 2024, Musk hosted a two-hour conversation with Trump on X, which, despite technical issues, reinforced their alignment. Trump reciprocated by praising Musk as a “star” in his election-night victory speech, cementing their public alliance.

Their partnership deepened post-election. On November 12, 2024, Trump appointed Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a new initiative aimed at slashing federal spending and streamlining bureaucracy. Musk’s role gave him unprecedented access to the White House, including attending Cabinet meetings, sitting in on calls with foreign leaders, and even holding Zoom discussions with figures like Nepal’s Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli and Bangladesh’s interim leader Muhammad Yunus.

Achievements and Benefits of the Alliance

Joint Achievements

The Trump-Musk partnership yielded several notable outcomes:

1. Amplification of Trump’s Campaign: Musk’s ownership of X and his financial contributions significantly boosted Trump’s 2024 campaign. X became a platform for right-wing messaging, with studies noting an increased visibility of conservative accounts following Musk’s endorsement. This helped Trump secure all seven battleground states and the popular vote, a historic achievement.
2. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): Musk and Ramaswamy proposed ambitious cuts, including a 75% reduction in the federal workforce, a $2 trillion reduction in federal spending, and the elimination of agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. While these proposals were controversial, they aligned with Trump’s campaign promise to reduce government bloat.
3. Public Displays of Support: In March 2025, Trump and Musk turned the White House lawn into a Tesla showroom, with Trump announcing his intent to buy a Tesla to counter global backlash against Musk’s political activities. This event symbolized their mutual support and Musk’s influence within the administration.

• Financial Backing: Musk’s $300 million in campaign contributions provided critical resources for Trump’s re-election, particularly in swing states.
• Tech Credibility: Associating with Musk, a renowned innovator, lent Trump’s administration a veneer of technological and business expertise.
• Access to X’s Platform: Musk’s control of X allowed Trump’s messaging to reach millions, amplifying his “America First” agenda.

• Political Influence: Musk’s role in DOGE and his proximity to Trump gave him unprecedented access to policymaking, elevating his status beyond a corporate leader to a quasi-governmental figure.
• Support for His Businesses: Trump’s public endorsement of Tesla, including the White House event, helped counter negative sentiment toward Musk’s companies amid his controversial political moves.
• Global Reach: Musk’s interactions with foreign leaders as Trump’s ally enhanced his international stature, particularly in discussions involving trade and technology.

1. Disillusionment with DOGE: Trump initially supported Musk’s ambitious cost-cutting plans, but the promised $2 trillion in savings proved unrealistic. As the projected savings dwindled, Trump grew skeptical of Musk’s claims, with one adviser quoting him as asking, “Was it all bullshit?”
2. Policy Disagreements: The primary catalyst for the breakup was Musk’s opposition to Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a sweeping tax and spending package. Musk criticized the bill on X, calling it a “massive spending bill” that undermined DOGE’s goals and increased the deficit by $2.4 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Trump countered that Musk’s objections stemmed from the bill’s removal of electric vehicle (EV) subsidies, which impacted Tesla’s bottom line.
3. Personal and Ego Clashes: Both men are known for their outsized personalities and desire for attention. Tech journalist Kara Swisher predicted their clash, noting, “There can be only one narcissist as head of the country, and that’s Donald Trump.” Musk’s frequent presence at the White House, including stays in the Lincoln Bedroom, and media portrayals like Time magazine’s cover of Musk at the Resolute desk, reportedly irked Trump.
4. Musk’s Exit from DOGE: In May 2025, Musk announced he would step back from DOGE to focus on Tesla, citing a drop in the company’s first-quarter profits. His formal exit as a special government employee was confirmed on May 28, though Trump initially praised him during a farewell event, presenting him with a ceremonial golden key. However, Musk’s suggestion to stay on was declined by Trump, signaling early strains.
5. Escalating Public Attacks: The feud erupted publicly on June 5, 2025, during a press conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Trump expressed disappointment, saying, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” Musk responded on X, accusing Trump of “ingratitude” and claiming, “Without me, Trump would have lost the election.” The rhetoric intensified, with Trump threatening to cancel Musk’s government contracts and Musk alleging, without evidence, Trump’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein-related documents.
6. Specific Policy Tensions: Musk’s opposition to Trump’s tariff policies, which he warned could trigger a recession, and his advocacy for free trade, particularly with Europe, clashed with Trump’s “America First” agenda. Additionally, the withdrawal of Jared Isaacman’s nomination as NASA administrator, a Musk ally, due to Senate opposition, further strained relations.

• GOP Internal Dynamics: Musk’s claim that he secured Republican majorities in Congress has been contested by party leaders like House Speaker Mike Johnson, who attribute the success to Trump. The feud may embolden Trump loyalists to distance themselves from Musk, potentially weakening his influence within the GOP. However, Musk’s suggestion of forming a new political party could disrupt the Republican base, though its viability remains uncertain.
• Midterm Elections: With the 2026 midterms approaching, Musk’s reduced political spending, as he indicated in May 2025, could limit Republican funding. Conversely, Trump’s ability to maintain party unity without Musk’s financial support will be tested.
• Public Perception: The public nature of the feud, amplified on X and Truth Social, risks alienating voters who supported the Trump-Musk alliance. Musk’s declining approval among Republicans (43% want him to have “a little” influence, per a recent poll) could further erode his political capital.

• Tesla and SpaceX: Trump’s threat to cancel government subsidies and contracts could impact SpaceX, which relies on NASA contracts, and Tesla, which benefits from EV incentives. Tesla’s stock fell 14% on June 5, 2025, reflecting market concerns about the feud’s impact.
• Broader Market Effects: Musk’s warnings about a potential recession due to Trump’s tariffs, echoed by some economists, highlight tensions between protectionist policies and free-market interests. A prolonged feud could exacerbate economic uncertainty, particularly if tariffs disrupt global trade.
• Innovation and Regulation: Musk’s reduced influence in Washington may shift regulatory priorities away from his vision for deregulation, potentially affecting industries like autonomous vehicles and AI, where Tesla and xAI compete.

• Polarization in Public Discourse: The feud, played out on social media, may deepen polarization, as supporters of Trump and Musk align with their respective camps. Musk’s unfollowing of Trump allies like Stephen Miller and Charlie Kirk on X signals a fracturing of personal networks within conservative circles.
• Impact on Alliances: The breakdown illustrates the fragility of alliances built on mutual convenience rather than shared values. Individuals may become more cautious about forming high-stakes partnerships, particularly when personal egos and public platforms amplify conflicts.
• Influence of Wealth in Politics: Musk’s role as a major donor and influencer raises questions about the role of billionaires in governance. Public backlash, evidenced by protests labeling Musk and Trump as “villains,” may prompt individuals to scrutinize the influence of wealth in shaping policy.